Table of Contents


Take Action to Build NC's Future

SB 1378 “Build NC’s Future Act”, sponsored by Senator Tony Foriest and Co-Sponsored by Democratic and Republic leaders in the Senate would “Create jobs and make North Carolina more competitive globally by financing the building of engineering education facilities, the enhancement and repair of state assets and community college assets, and investment in research and job training equipment at universities and community colleges."

 The bill passed the Senate and is now headed to the House for consideration and debate. While House leaders are supportive of the effort, they are concerned about the impact the additional debt would have on the budget and on the state’s triple A bond rating.

Here’s what the bill does:

Issues Certificates of Participation Over the Next Two Years for the Following Projects:

This Proposal Is Within Our Existing Debt Capacity

This Proposal Puts People Back to Work and Positions Our State for the Future

Why Make These Investments Now?

Savings in the Construction Market and the Opportunity to Create Economic Activity

Community Colleges Need new Equipment in Growing and High-Demand Fields

NC Can Easily Afford to Make This Critical Economic Investment

If you have a legislator on the list below of House Appropriations Chairs and Co-Chairs or House Finance Chairs, Co-Chairs and members, please call or e-mail them and let them know how important it is to invest in NC’s future by passing SB 1378.

Senior Chairman

Rep. Michaux

Chairman

Rep. Adams

Chairman

Rep. M. Alexander

Chairman

Rep. Crawford

Chairman

Rep. Haire

Chairman

Rep. Jeffus

Chairman

Rep. Tolson

Chairman

Rep. Yongue

Co-Chairman

Sen. Charles W. Albertson

Co-Chairman

Sen. Linda Garrou

Co-Chairman

Sen. A. B Swindell

Co-Chairman

Sen. Charlie S. Dannelly

Senior Chairman

Rep. Luebke

Chairman

Rep. Gibson

Chairman

Rep. Wainwright

Chairman

Rep. Weiss

Vice Chairman

Rep. Hill

Vice Chairman

Rep. Holliman

Vice Chairman

Rep. Howard

Vice Chairman

Rep. McComas

Vice Chairman

Rep. Womble

Members

Rep. K. Alexander, Rep. Blackwood, Rep. Blust, Rep. Braxton, Rep. Carney, Rep. Cotham, Rep. Faison, Rep. Folwell, Rep. Hall, Rep. Hughes, Rep. Jones, Rep. Lewis, Rep. McCormick, Rep. McGee, Rep. Owens, Rep. Rhyne, Rep. Ross, Rep. Setzer, Rep. Stam, Rep. Starnes, Rep. Tillis



Take Action in Support of NC Mobility Fund for Transportation

The NC Mobility Fund for Transportation was originally included in the Governor’s budget to fund projects of statewide significance – the first being Phase II of the Yadkin River Bridge Project (widening of I-85 on the north side of the bridge). Phase I, the bridge replacement, will be funded with GARVEE funds.

The revenue from the fund, included in the Governor’s budget, was proposed to come from an increase in various DMV fees and a reduction of the transfer from the Highway Trust Fund to the General Fund. By year three, when the transfer would be completely phased out, the fund would grow to over $300 million. A stakeholder process would be established to prioritize future projects eligible for the fund.

The Senate budget did not include the NC Mobility Fund.

 The House budget includes funding for the NC Mobility Fund but does not raise revenue from fees and does not provide additional funding beyond the Yadkin River Bridge Project. The House Mobility Fund proposal is as follows:

Urge legislators – especially budget conferees - to support the NC Mobility Fund. At the very least, funding included in the House proposal is critical to begin the second phase of the Yadkin River Bridge project. yle48"> While the House proposal is the minimum required, stakeholders, NCDOT and the Governor’s office would prefer something closer to the Governor’s proposal which included increased funding for Interstate maintenance ($30 million) and Municipal Powell Bill ($20 million).

ASK FOR TOTAL ELIMINATION OF TRANSFER of TRANSPORTATION FUNDS TO GENERAL FUND IN FUTURE YEARS


NC House Gives Final Passage to Budget Proposal

Last Friday, a little after midnight, the NC House gave its final approval with a vote of 63-49, mostly along party lines, to their budget proposal. This $18.9 billion proposal is similar to the Senate proposal passed earlier in that it aims to create jobs through targeted tax relief for small businesses and makes cuts across the board – but most significantly in education and health and human services. The University of North Carolina system would have to find another $139 million in spending cuts at its campuses and central office compared with the Senate plan. Public schools would benefit from $90 million more in North Carolina Education Lottery profits than the Senate used to preserve what House Democrats say are 1,600 positions in the classroom statewide. The House budget still counts on receiving almost half a billion dollars from the federal government as the result of a more generous Medicaid formula. However, budget writers warn that if the federal Medicaid money doesn’t materialize, there will be more drastic cuts.

Budget items of interest to engineers include:

House and Senate budget conferees will be announced within the next few days to work out their differences in time to send a compromise budget to the governor by July 1. Cuts to public education and the university system, debt, and proposed taxes and fees will likely to be the major issues of contention during the negotiations. Once the final budget is signed by the governor, it is likely that leaders in both the House and Senate will move to adjourn within a matter of days so that legislators can prepare for their upcoming elections in November.